From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIDZh-0003o6-2r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:00:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8LMr46F014756; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:53:04 GMT Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (eastrmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8LMnjAX017136 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:49:45 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.3] (really [68.102.201.166]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050921225545.FMDM8829.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@[10.3.1.3]> for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:55:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4331E4F5.3090506@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:55:49 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050731) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage References: <20050921172801.42BBEF5C20@mail.deploylinux.net> <1127325465.30787.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1127325465.30787.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB63D7C8F657658B8B774AB83" X-Archives-Salt: cd613c28-785f-45a9-a1c2-e3ae2fda198a X-Archives-Hash: 12ba9cd158e30d47782dd38a22a3791f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB63D7C8F657658B8B774AB83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 10:31 -0700, Matthew Marlowe wrote: > >>>>We could add a license, called "commercial" into the tree. This license >>>>would look like the following. >> >>I would definitly support adding "commercial" as a license group as part of >>GLEP23 implementation. > > > This isn't so much talking about GLEP23, but doing an interim > implementation *now* since I've not heard anything from GLEP23 for some > time. > > >>As part of adding any new commercial license to the tree, developers would have >>to add the license to the commercial group. >> >> >>>> While this will break completely >>>>interactive ebuilds until GLEP23 is fully implemented, a user can add >>>>the license to make.conf in an ACCEPT_LICENSE variable, to keep portage >>>>from asking again. >> >>We wouldnt break anything (hopefully) if we just do this as I specified above. > > > Except GLEP23 isn't implemented, so we cannot rely on it. Is this just a one-off implementation until GLEP 23 is implemented, or something that will complement it? Whats going to happen to this data after GLEP23 gets implemented? I'd hate to see something added simply because its a quick one-off solution to make something work. I'd rather see people focus on the actual GLEP and moving it along. Of course, if this data will just be an added feature of GLEP23, I don't see a problem. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enigB63D7C8F657658B8B774AB83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMeT1QW+hXSf0t0IRAkvuAJ48IV+LxA+ERZ9rDg46Tltf+CkLbQCfUCKK fdV1ZXkRHW4h9Z/yKxOe+EM= =3WG6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB63D7C8F657658B8B774AB83-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list