From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGhMv-0004MF-A1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:24:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8HIIwU4002955; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:18:58 GMT Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8HIHCoQ021912 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:17:12 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ool-4353307c.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.48.124]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.06 (built May 11 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IMZ000AX4DI0A00@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:22:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:22:26 -0400 From: Mark Loeser Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal In-reply-to: To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <432C5EE2.9030503@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=------------enigEFC3632B49FA5F2DE71562A9 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 References: <432B4549.1070400@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050815) X-Archives-Salt: 8e9ca6be-0362-4e20-811c-252dcb737670 X-Archives-Hash: d0352fd8594273bfd432d907e8f8e199 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEFC3632B49FA5F2DE71562A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kevin F. Quinn wrote: >> I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the dev-cpp >>category: > > > Is this bit really necessary? The reason for me adding that bit is the metadata from dev-cpp: The dev-cpp category contains libraries and utilities relevant to the c++ programming language. Now to me, that means I can find *all* relevant C++ stuff here. If we don't want that to be the case, maybe we should say "miscellaneous", but why should something be in dev-libs, as compared with dev-cpp? net-libs, I could understand, and dev-games, as those could be argued to have a direct relation. This is really just a matter of categorization, and isn't as big of a concern for me as it is trying to put all of these no-herd packages under a herd. Mark --------------enigEFC3632B49FA5F2DE71562A9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDLF7lCRZPokWLroQRAgI7AKCQnA8cdgn4H6/d1qQ6KrMWF6XjTwCfQ/MC bUq/7ByIIEus7JcG0a8IT3o= =J5vt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEFC3632B49FA5F2DE71562A9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list