From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGbBW-0006tL-Ip for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:48:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8HBgpFq023751; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:42:51 GMT Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8HBfBHd017975 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:41:11 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (YYYMMMXLIX.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.9.250]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257B4D1F5B for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:46:24 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <432C0212.3060106@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:46:26 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.12.0 Final - Testing References: <20050917104323.2C1B79F36B@derisoft.derived-software.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050917104323.2C1B79F36B@derisoft.derived-software.demon.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE6BD5F5ECFB9EA65545275EF" X-Archives-Salt: 32f89269-f325-4cf9-8dd1-3e75ddfc4698 X-Archives-Hash: 979893b9814f39049d8850f27ec4039d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE6BD5F5ECFB9EA65545275EF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Phil Richards wrote: > On 2005-09-14, John N. Laliberte wrote: >=20 > Normally, I would just unmask pmount, but the comment doesn't exactly > fill me with confidence as regards the stability of pmount (and whereas= > I am happy for gnome to crash in a heap, I tend to be a little more > cautious around things that work at lower levels in the system)... >=20 Actually if you look at the comment you can see that it is dbus and hal that seem to have the problems. I have used pmount without a problem for quite a while now. There is one bug open about pmount on bugs.gentoo.org but for me it looks like a user error. > > Should I just go ahead and unmask, or what if I want to test out gnome > 2.12? That I leave up to you. >=20 > phil Regards, Petteri R=C3=A4ty (Betelgeuse) --------------enigE6BD5F5ECFB9EA65545275EF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLAIVcxLzpIGCsLQRAqWyAJ4llEnjjogXqDWGhzRM1ifRkUrXCACgiEna eY3/zQKrxWj2BvMCSnEPYAQ= =SkOO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE6BD5F5ECFB9EA65545275EF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list