From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFMp8-0001RT-QP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:16:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8E2Afc0000940; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:10:41 GMT Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8E27sLl015173 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:07:55 GMT Received: from [66.56.24.178] (c-66-56-24-178.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[66.56.24.178]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005091402123101300pst4re>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:12:31 +0000 Message-ID: <43278936.50909@ieee.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:21:42 -0400 From: "Nathan L. Adams" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050722) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <4326C737.1020704@gentoo.org> <20050913162232.GA18592@cerberus.oppresses.us> <200509131918.23915.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200509131918.23915.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d3d0c1eb-3be4-43da-b1e8-102525a2c119 X-Archives-Hash: 72cb7ed65c6fec82488d4b6c7982922d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > if you read this whole thread you'll find that it is a grey area with > different devrel people saying/thinking different things in terms of what > devrel's responsibilities are It sounds like somebody needs to take a look at all of the existing documentation for this topic, write a GLEP that clarifies the matter, and present it to the council for a vote. - - who should enforce Gentoo policy (technical or otherwise)? - - what are the procedures for getting the enforcement done? - - what checks and balances are in place (and are more/clarification needed)? - - etc. Nathan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJ4k22QTTR4CNEQARAvbbAJwNtqXM9L9ycyCqmQoJrelYeNnE0wCgoRit 4mUsp/yONu4TfTAV5GVxSKk= =Mflu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list