From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EFKKV-0002wj-5W
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:36:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8DNUi57016207;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:30:44 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8DNRMj2025603
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:27:22 GMT
Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.115])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EFKFs-00013h-Op
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:32:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4327613B.80409@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:31:07 -0700
From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC
References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <200509131702.45512.vapier@gentoo.org> <43275620.3060501@gentoo.org> <200509131906.08912.vapier@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200509131906.08912.vapier@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 84e43d49-33f5-4288-bd23-3ccede074a0f
X-Archives-Hash: 98ece75f318e8207661fabb2825be308

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so your previous off-topic comment about redtape in devrel processes was 
> irrelevant :P

Not really, because my opinion that devrel shouldn't be involved is not 
automatically turned into reality (much to my regret). I'm trying to 
supply evidence why this should stay between QA and infra.

> at any rate, you're proposing giving the control to the QA team which has no 
> guidelines or processes outlined, let alone the manpower.  devrel has all of 
> these.

And devrel is the wrong group to handle it, so QA needs to come up with 
some guidelines.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list