From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFDkN-0001M6-0q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:35:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8DGTlHd003744; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:29:47 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8DGS8Bj020169 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:28:08 GMT Received: from nemacur.cns.ksu.edu ([129.130.0.166]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EFDi6-0000LH-SJ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:32:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4326FED4.8030104@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:31:16 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050729) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost> <20050912220029.GX9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509122159.32575.vapier@gentoo.org> <43265B48.6050506@ieee.org> <4326A271.1020903@gentoo.org> <4326C737.1020704@gentoo.org> <20050913162232.GA18592@cerberus.oppresses.us> In-Reply-To: <20050913162232.GA18592@cerberus.oppresses.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5624FAAB8B114296CCDBADE1" X-Archives-Salt: 31244550-4b43-4d95-aa88-d3a07748c7e5 X-Archives-Hash: 243688354f31f312db3476e7eb26cb91 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5624FAAB8B114296CCDBADE1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:33:59AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > >>The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area. > > > No it hasn't, unless by 'gray area' you mean 'a few people who don't > like devrel claim it shouldn't be able to do anything because drobbins > set it up' > > Recruitment, conflict resolution, disciplinary issues. I.e., 'managing > developers.' Right, thats what I'm saying. If the council says its approved and thats what they do, they can't complain/bitch about it because drobbins set it up unless they want the council to charge them to change it. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig5624FAAB8B114296CCDBADE1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJv7UQW+hXSf0t0IRAtn8AKCzMTGEgi4CZ+bxqNOMC2VEEqMTegCfaKeo mPIB01z2pAebbyTY6dG6LHo= =4Occ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5624FAAB8B114296CCDBADE1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list