From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFBFI-0006Eb-C8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:54:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8DDnYfX026885; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:49:34 GMT Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8DDlrrT017908 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:47:53 GMT Received: from aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050913135228.NQZK23002.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:52:28 +0100 Received: from zog.reactivated.net ([81.99.81.161]) by aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050913135228.VWVF22901.aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@zog.reactivated.net> for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:52:28 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (dsd [192.168.0.2]) by zog.reactivated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9177E47F6 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:27:16 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4326D999.3040509@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:52:25 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050820) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug 80905 References: <1126617879.5910.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1126617879.5910.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a251779e-436d-498b-a108-8afc8ea54596 X-Archives-Hash: 29fd7875c1dc3f04c2ead333a4be7dd0 Frank Schafer wrote: > Does someone know if it's worth a try with the vanilla and if vanilla > here means a really vanilla from kernel.org or if it's sufficient to get > the (too patched and thus not so vanilla) vanilla-sources. vanilla-sources is not patched. > Please be kind with me regarding to the fact that I'm posting here. On > the gentoo mailing list I get only replies like: "You probably have > faulty memory." If THIS would be the fact the bug would show up randomly > in different ebuilds or at least at different lines of code. Faulty hardware can cause all kinds of unexplainable behaviour. Don't base your judgement on this. One final point, if you are running vesafb-tng and have >=1GB RAM then try turning off vesafb-tng for now. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list