From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EF7ZU-0006JI-9v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:59:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D9sCj6016898; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:54:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D9qXPo023872 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:52:34 GMT Received: from user.scort.com ([213.41.103.70] helo=[10.1.10.18]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EF7XF-0001VR-MG for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:05 +0000 Message-ID: <4326A271.1020903@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:57:05 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050728) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost> <20050912220029.GX9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509122159.32575.vapier@gentoo.org> <43265B48.6050506@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: <43265B48.6050506@ieee.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f9102a69-1157-4947-aecf-aa3ab6efc1ce X-Archives-Hash: b15bc47aee65da849b8e7e7832a1cac4 Nathan L. Adams wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>>right ... once a GLEP has been hammered out and approved, there isnt really >>>anything left for managers/council to do ... it's then up to whoever to get >>>it done ;) > > They *could* do some 'creative re-org' a.k.a. remove some folks from > their current roles if they are willfully breaking the rules... This is the role of devrel enforcement arm. The complaint / investigation / judgement / appeal process is already defined. The council enters the stage only at the appeals step to limit abuse of power situations (and of course to define what policy really is). I for one am committed to help in enforcement of any policy that has been decided, but only in the limits of what we were elected for (we won't replace project leads or devrel). -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list