From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EF2Jb-0007Gc-Jl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:22:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D4HU5r026616; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:17:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D4F24E005810 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:15:02 GMT Received: from ip68-102-201-166.ks.ok.cox.net ([68.102.201.166] helo=[10.3.1.4]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EF2Ga-00042z-4U for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:19:32 +0000 Message-ID: <4326532B.20007@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:18:51 -0500 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050731) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org> <1126555733.6559.7.camel@localhost> <20050912205326.GW9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost> <20050912220029.GX9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050912220029.GX9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB756CF34907218398DD3BF3A" X-Archives-Salt: 774f7b40-d6d6-4385-96a9-d9b23426f7fc X-Archives-Hash: d08e56ff2f3595efc064ae554b3f9ed9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB756CF34907218398DD3BF3A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Grant Goodyear wrote: > Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] > >>>I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some >>>time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. >> >>or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo >>infrastructure (?) > > > Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out > w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said > that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of > contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page > seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" > version.) A correction, the bug# is 98272. This is correct. Last I knew port001 was working on a python based version of this. If this has changed, we need to know about. Also, before people go developing a new site that may potentially become an official site, I would like to require them to submit an implementation plan to the infra team via a bug or some other method. I don't want to end up supporting every framework out there just because its cool. If you're using something other than what we're currently using, I would like to see justification for using it beyond "its a call framework". Anyways, we have the space open for it, just haven't heard from port001 in a while about it. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enigB756CF34907218398DD3BF3A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJlMuQW+hXSf0t0IRAkwqAKCAknaCfaDHQbjZLMZqCg7Bm+FeJgCdEfqA Hs2ju3JiELXRp6qs2IgsyKw= =3wNq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB756CF34907218398DD3BF3A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list