From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEzq0-0006yj-Vs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:43:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D1ckDm013098; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:38:46 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D1b3mD019181 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:37:03 GMT Received: from [207.72.143.170] (207-72-143-170.dovers_res_net.spartan-net.net [207.72.143.170] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D1fVX1013371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <43262E51.7050504@egr.msu.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:41:37 -0400 From: Alec Warner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050806) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff References: <4325D984.1050105@gentoo.org> <200509131604.29767.chriswhite@gentoo.org> <4326059A.3040004@gentoo.org> <432610A1.8050604@egr.msu.edu> <432614F3.2080704@gentoo.org> <1126570437.3416.6.camel@localhost> <43261CBB.4070609@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43261CBB.4070609@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7f024109-b568-4eab-841f-bac3f7b7e186 X-Archives-Hash: 39f0e892c8f8483dcf69ebebbfed75d7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen P. Becker wrote: >> You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev. > > > Wrong. > >> My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as >> being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't need commit >> access. > > > My point exactly! Why have another category? > >> If the people involved decide they want to become committing >> devs, it also make it easier to make that transition. If they don't >> want to commit, they can stay as an AT. > > > Then shall we reclassify all the developers that currently don't have > commit access to the portage tree? > > -Steve And how is an "Arch Dev" different from say a member of devrel? It's not a category per se, it's a role. Person X does Devrel, person Y does portage, you do Arch Developing on MIPS, and new dev Z is an Arch Tester. How does this make anything more difficult than it already is? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQyYuUWzglR5RwbyYAQLyJA/+KiO5kzJGjqX57fTWOM6eN86JiCmfDvfY YzbnEBc7IThiNxvNTyPCnzPE9Wo22MqrVKdcWIrKYx0T+xkX89EzV4779vmhj00f qhDRSDRx09nENQ2mIDDU7733LgMKgAp0IqVgmBH48HUKDjAOEgVhHO82Byii9Yiw ysXoJkfth6RQ44PW5TTYvD9d+r+RKB4PYk6Q1SrJAk9yYaL6HDq/zrRMrFvNeABH HojBiOkdG/IvbF2jW/A7nx1V27HAzo21XR+9EbtUIrrMc5fP2V4UcTQ39TZGQRo2 A33qEMsZmNmE/0awcEmSkglQfGQ6VSVT/Ha2SC9NuIAIRXE3ynVc1bi+T5II5W/n +HTa0Bq6cTmTNOaxNU1Ym6A5aiQdfrcQYvH/yYBJGAHwr4XseLl5qQoCycn77mjP aeFo81a/Vm31k36CZROR4iIWid8uNl2PnmBSyvnYJpWX8UaqES92JWUm34yS2sND e5v/srIsdQf+chaxHwaU9r6R0OQEdIuIbyh6OD/khEuSrrcUbsPpTyOUnCVNduC3 wxqOqUsLerSmL/PPjZxCxV2xpsbsr+PmhPWBQY8NgOAsY6mVEgok6Cx2jMF6DVK5 uk/zomSi4uMvhpps/LotDImi5/TcTsBnnoKjIIOpjfcvAv8U9GzZVBrnmONuqW1C wO+x++yjIJk= =S6q7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list