From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEyhU-0007KN-QD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:31:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8D0PLLd004101; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:25:21 GMT Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D0M9YA019548 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:22:09 GMT Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@evil-vivi.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.12]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8D0QbMK011255 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:26:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (blacksburg-bsr1-69-170-32-128.chvlva.adelphia.net [69.170.32.128]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (MOS 3.6.4-CR) with ESMTP id EBD03620 (AUTH spbecker); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <43261CBB.4070609@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:26:35 -0400 From: "Stephen P. Becker" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050807) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff References: <4325D984.1050105@gentoo.org> <200509131604.29767.chriswhite@gentoo.org> <4326059A.3040004@gentoo.org> <432610A1.8050604@egr.msu.edu> <432614F3.2080704@gentoo.org> <1126570437.3416.6.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1126570437.3416.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9d21e60a-ccb8-4291-8300-038078104952 X-Archives-Hash: e502bff0d2a8da2bc9521ecf552d7893 > You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev. Wrong. > My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as > being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't need commit > access. My point exactly! Why have another category? > If the people involved decide they want to become committing > devs, it also make it easier to make that transition. If they don't > want to commit, they can stay as an AT. Then shall we reclassify all the developers that currently don't have commit access to the portage tree? -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list