From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECh21-0005VL-W4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:14:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86HAn0J001449; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:10:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86H91PR006673 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:09:01 GMT Received: from s01060050bab40e5b.ed.shawcable.net ([68.148.132.114] helo=[192.168.0.24]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ECgzd-0007SV-Gd for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:12:21 +0000 Message-ID: <431DCDDF.2070000@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 11:11:59 -0600 From: Joshua Baergen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050821) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125863332.11366.89.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904210535.24ab8a39@snowdrop.home> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904205307.GG23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125869984.11364.143.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2bddcf85-bb29-42be-a390-aadcd0e9be66 X-Archives-Hash: 7626e2df5f18f5176bcaff3fb3bb4f4b Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > MAINTENANCE="~x86" # Maintainer uses x86, package not deemed stable > > > I would even suggest not indicating maintainer arch at all. If ATs are going to be responsible for keywording we should blackbox the process to ward off assumptions and laziness. Whether the maintainer thinks it's stable or not on x86 should not affect the AMD64 AT, or even the x86 AT for that matter. We could even boil it down to M_STABLE="yes"|"no" at that point (suggestions for variable name welcome). -- Joshua Baergen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list