From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EA7m9-0007l1-16 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:11:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7UF8GHi026488; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:08:16 GMT Received: from mail.pnpitalia.it (85-18-21-122.ip.fastwebnet.it [85.18.21.122]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7UF4iV2019104 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:04:44 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.pnpitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9577AD6F8 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.pnpitalia.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (db [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27948-03 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.4.153] (host-4-153.pnpitalia.it [192.168.4.153]) by mail.pnpitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122817AD6F6 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <431474CD.3070502@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:01:33 +0200 From: Francesco R User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at db X-Archives-Salt: 85307050-2539-4906-b7b4-81c85c8cbdfd X-Archives-Hash: cd03c4be799545472ea22af920c730e0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Is this also a good time to note that the amd64 and x86 could > *easily* be covered under the same keyword? We cover a large > variety of mips machines/userlands under one keyword, with > differences much more significant then that between x86 and amd64. Sorry I disagree with this, differences exists and sometimes are a problem. Some package and library don't compile cleanly under amd64 arch. On few but existant cases it's good to have two different archs. Not even going near the analizing the differences in the profiles. rgs, Francesco -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDFHTN1wNBTLVPMuARAkCpAJ4gkQQ9Ntp9j5dsldyFLLt1lj/iTgCfahlF avwo9tHBaW1LTWWPeLPDFO4= =yYUZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list