public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Donnie Berkholz" <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: <baz@scms.waikato.ac.nz>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for retirement of old gentoo 'versions'
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:17:29 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43062.205.241.48.33.1088734649.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40E4B84B.1040501@scms.waikato.ac.nz>

Barry Shaw said:
> Is there any policy/ideas/consensus among developers about how long a
> particular "version" will remain supported in portage?  If not, it might
> be a useful idea to set sunset dates for particular "versions" of gentoo
> (as I doubt they are all going to be supported indefinitely).  If there
> is a clear end date, it prevents anyone being caught out unexpectedly.

I generally keep a minimum of two ebuilds in, so testing for a newly
introduced problem is easier. If I put out seven ebuilds in two weeks for
some ungodly reason, I don't expect to be maintaining some sort of minimum
lifetime for each ebuild -- just the newest two will stick around.

We have no policy stating a minimum support lifetime for any given version
right now (AFAIK, of course), despite a push for it amidst emphasis for
Gentoo in the enterprise.

Donnie



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-02  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-02  1:20 [gentoo-dev] Policy for retirement of old gentoo "versions" Barry Shaw
2004-07-02  2:17 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2004-07-02 12:48   ` [gentoo-dev] Policy for retirement of old gentoo 'versions' Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-02 13:44     ` William Kenworthy
2004-07-02 14:41       ` Grant Goodyear
2004-07-02 15:15         ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-02 20:29           ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-02 21:06             ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-02 21:37               ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-03  6:34                 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-04 22:10                   ` Marius Mauch
2004-07-05  1:14                     ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-04 22:16                   ` Barry Shaw
2004-07-05  1:01                     ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-05  2:19                       ` Barry Shaw
2004-07-02 20:21       ` Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43062.205.241.48.33.1088734649.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu \
    --to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
    --cc=baz@scms.waikato.ac.nz \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox