From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5755-0000NB-7C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:26:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7GJOK2p021193; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:24:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7GJL0qM003715 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:21:00 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1E570H-0007g7-Rk for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:21:41 +0000 Message-ID: <43023CC6.1050206@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:21:42 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050813) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules References: <42AD8D53.1080100@gentoo.org> <1124219235.19895.27.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> In-Reply-To: <1124219235.19895.27.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 138aceab-8ceb-456a-98f0-ca04d8cea09e X-Archives-Hash: e0087e42738ea3a878b519f94f75f2ae -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huddleston wrote: | The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn | repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect). | Their main reasons for this are better QA and less overhead for releases | and merging. And unnecessarily tying releases together of things that have no reason to be tied together. It's fine to keep all the source in the same repository, but don't lock releases of unrelated modules together. That's the same thing X went through and has finally learned with the modularization effort. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDAjzGXVaO67S1rtsRAt/jAKC5iEbkyTvqTAm44EB1PVur7wqDiwCcC/HD umiI6mrs67f+YBVxDAJz/0U= =yK5P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list