From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzjgU-0008L4-7E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:27:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j71NPj5I005196; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:25:45 GMT Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.76.28]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j71NN7YJ003280 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:23:07 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (pcp0011842295pcs.waldrf01.md.comcast.net[69.251.97.45]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005080123231901300qclh3e>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:23:19 +0000 Message-ID: <42EEAEF4.4080504@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:23:32 -0400 From: Kumba User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on References: <20050706224651.GA19853@kroah.com> <1120745893.11567.42.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050708171252.GD29606@kroah.com> <20050801221403.GA2244@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20050801221403.GA2244@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab9de870-bbcd-46fe-8843-e84c2f83f400 X-Archives-Hash: 413c1c933e27e273022b8d86d5e2ac98 Greg KH wrote: > Ok, 064-r1 version of udev does this for tty and console devices. The > old devfs names are now gone. Because of this, and some other config > file tweaks, starting udev now only takes .5 seconds on my old, slow > laptop, instead of 5 seconds. Hopefully others will also see such an > increase. > > Now to implement the persistent block device names that we showed > everyone at OLS... Does this happen to also fix the bus error on sparc mentioned in Bug #99290? I see in the Changelog a reference to a sparc fix, but the bug hasn't been updated regarding the status. --Kumba -- Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list