From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DslZ2-00053y-Hg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:02:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6DI0DBf013938; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:00:13 GMT Received: from smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.169.227]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6DHvgC9031285 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:43 GMT Received: (qmail 56636 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2005 17:58:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.50.105?) (richard?j?fish@212.180.33.26 with plain) by smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2005 17:58:45 -0000 Message-ID: <42D528B6.7060209@asmallpond.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:44:06 +0200 From: Richard Fish User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050623) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on References: <20050706224651.GA19853@kroah.com> <42D0189F.1030802@asmallpond.org> <1121068039.11171.2.camel@lycan.lan> <200507121808.57741.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200507121808.57741.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 41537350-a163-4553-8379-7df65f32bdb9 X-Archives-Hash: db35654dcfe50f11883ecf72d39fdd31 Mike Frysinger wrote: >On Monday 11 July 2005 03:47 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > >>On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 20:34 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: >> >> >>> for d in 0 1 2 3; do >>> /sbin/mdadm --assemble --config=partitions --auto=md >>>--super-minor=$d /dev/md$d >/dev/null 2>&1 >>> done >>> >>>Maybe something similar will be required in /sbin/rc, like you currently >>>do for LVM and the device mapper? It isn't a critical problem >>>though...I am pretty sure there are only a few Gentoo users who will >>>ever see this...maybe as few as 1!!! >>> >>> >>Mike, what do you think? This viable? We could maybe add an init addon >>for md, and move the lvm/whatever stuff to that as well? >> >> > >i dont see the point ... ive already fixed raidtools / mdadm to generate >device nodes before running since udev doesnt do it correctly/at all >-mike > > Oh, yes, I see that now. Sorry for the noise. -Richard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list