From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnOUo-0003gZ-5M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:23:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5SMMi4m010225; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:22:44 GMT Received: from smtp08.web.de (smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5SMKR0d006619 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:20:27 GMT Received: from [84.61.7.50] (helo=[192.168.1.5]) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #297) id 1DnORy-0004CY-00 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:21:02 +0200 Message-ID: <42C1CD32.2090605@email.de> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:20:34 +0200 From: Christian Hartmann User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050614) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project References: <789633874@web.de> <20050628090305.GA11530@gentoo.org> <20050628100658.GA13787@gentoo.org> <20050628102818.GA13837@gentoo.org> <42C12B9D.9020004@gentoo.org> <20050628112004.GB7891@cerberus.oppresses.us> <1119995365.24275.34.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <1119996191.13756.170.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1119996191.13756.170.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: christian.hartmann@email.de X-Sender: perlmeister@web.de X-Archives-Salt: b09d4885-11b5-421d-b5c0-67d57118c8e1 X-Archives-Hash: 3dcdeee138732a617fab0fe0bde8cf85 John Mylchreest wrote: > Infra developers are more often than not package maintainers etc as > well, and have cvs rights. if they don't have cvs rights, they look > after core infrastructure which is vital to Gentoo's survival. Forums built a community. Quote: '"Best support" went to the Gentoo Forums' http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20050314-newsletter.xml#doc_chap4 > Not to take away from the importance (or lack of depending on view) of > moderating the forums, but they are not as critical as official > literature and infrastructure, and also do not necessarily require in > depth knowledge of the technical aspects of any post. So I guess it doesn't matter to you if we would advise to use -0mg-optimized flags rather then the ones that (core-)developers recommend? > Regardless, I would prefer the term "Staff." Sure. As I stated before I'd be fine with that. > Also, I don't really see the need in having shell access to the > developer boxes. what use would this be? To host patches, docs etc. Just like every other devs/staff guy does atm. (Sure. toucan isn't meant to be a download server and we're aware of this fact.) -- Kind regards, Christian Hartmann Broicher Str. 34 46049 Oberhausen Germany Mobile: +49 0173 20 71 871 PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2154E5EE692A4865 Key fingerprint = 4544 EC0C BAE4 216F 5981 7F95 2154 E5EE 692A 4865 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list