From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DklhA-0000Me-So for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:33:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5LGWJ94025738; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:32:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5LGT8EW016830 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:29:09 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Dklcx-0006Yk-0W for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:29:31 +0000 Message-ID: <42B84069.10602@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:29:29 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050411) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and IUSE References: <200506200943.23762.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200506201637.19049.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <42B7A18F.7090507@gentoo.org> <200506220635.27768.jstubbs@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200506220635.27768.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5ea4b5ca-a92b-4307-8eeb-572a3565560f X-Archives-Hash: 7ff4ceb9b7a037918f8f5fd3875e5c19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason Stubbs wrote: > Any reason why INPUT_DEVICES is needed in USE_EXPAND rather than just as local > USE flags? It's kind of the odd one out among the above. The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sense as USE flags, so it should be something else. In this case, that was INPUT_DEVICES. We haven't been able to take much advantage of it yet, but it may work out better after X's upstream modularization. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCuEBpXVaO67S1rtsRApqXAKCssJLG1lWtsoNXWGz05I8vGoxw1wCgvPGF SaEd0RXRIJqok+oOjgUg39Y= =SZxT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list