From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DjaaK-0008AO-Bk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:29:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5IAT32W009913; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:29:03 GMT Received: from smtp20.libero.it (smtp20.libero.it [193.70.192.147]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5IARPix025880 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:27:26 GMT Received: from localhost (172.16.1.83) by smtp20.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41D02C980261D0CE for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:27:43 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (151.44.53.209) by smtp2.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41BF65E40861CA78 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: <42B3F713.1000108@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:27:31 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050518 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12 References: <42B3A17D.6090306@leetworks.com> <200506180050.13233.vapier@gentoo.org> <42B3A8A7.9060508@leetworks.com> <20050617230517.0e976362@enterprise.weeve.org> <42B3B94E.70204@gentoo.org> <42B3B965.1030804@leetworks.com> <42B3BEAE.40608@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42B3BEAE.40608@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv4 X-Archives-Salt: 25e95f46-83d4-457f-ab76-425367dc0e05 X-Archives-Hash: d98930e0c4ecf9d7f90b4e07f62bcad1 Kumba wrote: > I'm just stating this, because once reiserfs4 goes mainline (I believe > it's in -mm currently), we are bound to have users hitting various bumps > and ruts in the road using it, and if they file bugs to our bugzilla > that aren't related to patches we produce, then they'll likely wind up > closed as invalid and such. This saves the users time, and may get them > the answers they seek (or at least a resolution of some kind). It also > saves our bug-wranglers time by now having to deal with more invalid bugs. > We can always patch the problem in the g-s ^^ Given reiserfs4 is around for enough time and lots of brave users tested it, it MAY be not so unstable. (still I like jfs and xfs more, and I use them just for transient data (large video and image processing tests and so on)) -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list