From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiO12-0007qF-7Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:52:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5F2p9xF005876; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:51:09 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5F2nTBQ015769 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:49:29 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DiNyo-0007rd-1P for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:50:14 +0000 Message-ID: <42AF9765.8090800@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:50:13 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050411) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support References: <20050613144048.GB4585@lightning.stealer.net> <1118703403.28392.5.camel@localhost> <20050615012635.GJ4585@lightning.stealer.net> In-Reply-To: <20050615012635.GJ4585@lightning.stealer.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e409006d-a8f5-42df-bba8-6e73a8f28511 X-Archives-Hash: 69da356b5b633eaf42dbb43f1db1eb5f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Wegener wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse, >>package.use.auto or are you set on .force? > > > As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic > activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but > none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my > opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard > term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or > needed by the profile. How about use.required, since they're required by the profile? Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCr5dlXVaO67S1rtsRApFKAKC917D/EwbWvRLY4R8uZ5WwcCk5zgCgw1jE 5solEKLmab3YZXV7qehfXSg= =VfRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list