From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oscar.berkshire.net (oscar.berkshire.net [12.111.80.68]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j58Fd220024676 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:39:02 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.101] (josejx.berkshire.net [140.186.114.226]) by oscar.berkshire.net (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j58FcxW3005685 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:39:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42A7111B.5040306@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:39:07 -0400 From: Joseph Jezak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050419) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering References: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> <200506072232.36536.cryos@gentoo.org> <20050607214457.GH19249@kaf.zko.hp.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9b771b09-89e2-4862-a84e-5e021aa0007a X-Archives-Hash: 81c37be30bd6794b1c1788f105465a05 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Agreed, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable > whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does. This is not usually our policy. However, because we moved GCC-3.4 to stable before many arches, there were a number of packages that needed to be marked stable for PPC in order for the stable version to even compile. What should we have done in this case then? - -Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCpxEbwGq7BLLARfoRAogWAJ0XBbZ6v+iBB2U2t60f/cXjXo+zPgCcDOd8 wniWOuMxUOcqAZqKcksgRBo= =IC/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list