From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@cesmail.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:31:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A66675.20900@cesmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050607212929.0E1A8F5951@mail.deploylinux.net>
Matthew Marlowe wrote:
>A clueful sysadmin with gentoo is a far superior arrangement
>provided the rate of hardware installs isn't too much. For very large
>environments with 100+ boxes, I'd definitly agree with you that
>gentoo has a long way to go.
>
>
Well ... as far as I'm concerned, "clueful sysadmin" == Gentoo Certified
Engineer. That's something we *can* do -- start certifying people the
same way Red Hat does.
For large environments with 100+ boxes, as long as they're all x86 and
i686 or better, you could have a small-to-medium compile farm with
/usr/portage/packages exported via NFS.
>I think Gentoo shouldn't rule out providing some support and flexibility
>for any need that a significant amount of its userbase is interested in.
>And, I know there are a significant number of devs already who
>have at least some interest in enterprise support do to conversations
>I've had via IRC.
>
>I definitly don't expect that the entire gentoo community or dev base
>should go substantially out of their way or change organizational structure
>to facilitate enterprise capabilities. Just allow some startup biz that
>eventually comes along to be able to provide a backported snapshot
>based tree for their own customers.
>
>
I think you underestimate the difficulty of running a successful
"startup biz". I don't think Ubuntu would have gotten where they are if
the founder hadn't been rich to start with.
>>>Also I find it amusing when people say that Gentoo exists for the
>>>users. I think that is wrong. Gentoo exists for the *developers*.
>>>It's our playground, and it's the reason we use a live tree rather
>>>than switching to an actually sane approach. The users are cool
>>>because they point out bugs, help solve problems on bugzilla, suggest
>>>enhancements, provide patches, and notify us of package updates.
>>>Sometimes they become developers. But the truth is that Gentoo sees
>>>improvement and maintenance in the areas that appeal to the
>>>developers. And that is why Gentoo exists for the developers first,
>>>the users second.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>Thats part of the reason that I'm a developer - because I like interacting
>with the dev community here. But, the users have their own role and
>the above could be taken the wrong way.
>
>
Well ... as a user, I certainly didn't take it the wrong way.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-08 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 21:31 Fw: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo? Matthew Marlowe
2005-06-08 3:31 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [this message]
2005-06-08 4:16 ` Joshua Brindle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A66675.20900@cesmail.net \
--to=znmeb@cesmail.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox