From: sf <sf@b-i-t.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: sys-pam category
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A45861.5010107@b-i-t.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506051350.15778.mcummings@gentoo.org>
Michael Cummings wrote:
> Solar,
> I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a
> flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on:
>
> On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
>> Invalidates binary package trees.
>
> My (wrong?) understanding was that this is addressed when portage runs a
> fixpackages (otherwise what's it doing to all those binary packages?). I ask
...
I always thought it was known that fixpackages is a non-working kludge;
my portage tree/binary packages get messed up with almost every package
move, rename etc.
If fixpackages is supposed to be working who should I assign my soon to
be regular, estimated twice-weekly bug reports to?
Regards
Stephan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-06 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-05 14:22 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-05 14:44 ` Alin Nastac
2005-06-06 0:34 ` Mike Doty
2005-06-06 4:00 ` Alin Nastac
2005-06-05 15:37 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 16:34 ` Jonas Geiregat
2005-06-05 16:42 ` foser
2005-06-05 17:25 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 18:13 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 20:57 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 21:03 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-05 21:55 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-06 10:43 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2005-06-05 19:13 ` Jonas Geiregat
2005-06-05 17:34 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-05 19:03 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-05 19:21 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-05 20:13 ` Ned Ludd
2005-06-06 19:47 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-06-05 17:50 ` Michael Cummings
2005-06-05 18:10 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-06 14:06 ` sf [this message]
2005-06-06 14:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jason Stubbs
2005-06-05 15:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ian Leitch
2005-06-05 22:03 ` Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A45861.5010107@b-i-t.de \
--to=sf@b-i-t.de \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox