From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out.coditel.net (smtp-out.coditel.net [212.95.66.33]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j55JDmet021761 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:13:48 GMT Received: from smtp.coditel.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out.coditel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2069EB1B0 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:13:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (cable-213.214.37.239.coditel.net [213.214.37.239]) by smtp.coditel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C232FD32 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:13:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42A34EF3.5000700@sdf-eu.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 21:13:55 +0200 From: Jonas Geiregat User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050520) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category References: <200506051622.24240@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1117985871.30949.13.camel@localhost> <42A32997.3010502@sdf-eu.org> <1117989777.13069.4.camel@rivendell> <42A3358B.20802@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: <42A3358B.20802@ieee.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: clean on smtp.coditel.net X-Archives-Salt: 686aa8e2-2110-4b86-9663-ed73038f6d6b X-Archives-Hash: 097936ded5afcc86097550defd7de120 Nathan L. Adams wrote: > >>Then why is their a browsable "Categories" link on the packages site? >> >>http://packages.gentoo.org/categories/ >> >> Very good question , .. >>I don't agree with Ned. Organizing the packages logically makes things >>less confusing for the end-user and developers alike and doesn't qualify >>as a "cosmetic reason". It *is* valuable work, IMHO. >> >> >> I often use simple unix tools like ls grep etc .. to search for things in my portage tree I find that this goes alot quicker then using the user utilities , so I guess your right those need more attention then the tree structure. >>That's not to say that the user tools shouldn't be improved where >>possible, of course. I don't think anyone would argue with that. >> >>Nathan >> >> >> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list