[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal

[Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Karl :-)

>>In case there are no security Bugs, i'd like to ask you to leave them in
>>for the time being, I'm working on getting the latest versions (8.0/8.1)
>>of ifort (how it is now known) and icc into the tree. The only problem
>>are my time constraints atm :-/. Though I have ebuilds ready, it will
>>still take some time to remove some minor itches before I'd commit them.

> Last time I started hacking on this, I was told to stop by the current
> maintainer at the time (xtv), because he was going to do Major Changes
> Real Soon Now.
> 
> I have an interest in keeping this ebuild in the tree, and would offer
> my assistance to whatever effort Danny is engaged in.
> 
> Danny: Please put the ebuilds somewhere I can work on them, so that we
> can get this baby working RSN;)

Please have a look at

  http://dev.gentoo.org/~kugelfang/ebuilds/

where you should find ebuilds for icc, ifc and mkl. The icc one does
not yet fully work on amd64. ifc works fine and mkl too.

icc needs the most work still.

Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCgo/WaVNL8NrtU6IRArtyAKCMv97hhKucFEkkXFTHiawlCyXeLQCeOjHM
/KzPTmS3/+/N2+8XBJ/88gE=
=vlp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list