From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vintereik.ii.uib.no (vintereik.ii.uib.no [129.177.16.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4BMiiZq026847 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:44:44 GMT Received: from 29pc198.sshunet.nl ([145.97.198.29]:54571) by vintereik.ii.uib.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1DVzwa-000173-Ng; Thu, 12 May 2005 00:44:44 +0200 Message-ID: <42828A36.5030501@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 00:41:58 +0200 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny van Dyk CC: Brian Harring , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal References: <20050510053621.GG26049@exodus.wit.org> <42805257.1090601@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42805257.1090601@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a3a8c2ce-5515-461d-b7e0-64d1652120c0 X-Archives-Hash: 60ae04b7086472f1a0834e68ff6541f2 Danny van Dyk wrote: > Hi Brian, > Brian Harring schrieb: > >>>Unless someone steps up, the intel compiler toolchain >>>packages dev-lang/icc (intel cc) and dev-lang/ifc (intel fortran >>>compiler) are prime candidates for removal from the tree; open bugs, >>>primary maintainer is retired, and no devs have moved in to pick up the >>>packages, let along touched the changeslogs in around a year. >>> >>>So, any takers? >>>~brian > > > In case there are no security Bugs, i'd like to ask you to leave them in > for the time being, I'm working on getting the latest versions (8.0/8.1) > of ifort (how it is now known) and icc into the tree. The only problem > are my time constraints atm :-/. Though I have ebuilds ready, it will > still take some time to remove some minor itches before I'd commit them. Last time I started hacking on this, I was told to stop by the current maintainer at the time (xtv), because he was going to do Major Changes Real Soon Now. I have an interest in keeping this ebuild in the tree, and would offer my assistance to whatever effort Danny is engaged in. Danny: Please put the ebuilds somewhere I can work on them, so that we can get this baby working RSN;) -- Karl T -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list