From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (outmx002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AHT34J003607 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 17:29:04 GMT Received: from outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j4AHT3i9026066 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 19:29:03 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from [10.0.0.39] (114-96.247.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.247.96.114]) by outmx002.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j4AHSvkq026013; Tue, 10 May 2005 19:28:57 +0200 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <4280EF59.4050309@wis.kuleuven.be> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:28:57 +0200 From: Tom Van Doorsselaere User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: kugelfang@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal References: <20050510053621.GG26049@exodus.wit.org> <42805257.1090601@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42805257.1090601@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c3d6462a-dab5-4a8b-8b75-773b9ea1d97a X-Archives-Hash: f90f9967fbf65ee5f317d6500e2d2195 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Danny van Dyk wrote: | Hi Brian, | Brian Harring schrieb: | |>>Unless someone steps up, the intel compiler toolchain |>>packages dev-lang/icc (intel cc) and dev-lang/ifc (intel fortran |>>compiler) are prime candidates for removal from the tree; open bugs, |>>primary maintainer is retired, and no devs have moved in to pick up the |>>packages, let along touched the changeslogs in around a year. |>> |>>So, any takers? |>>~brian | | | In case there are no security Bugs, i'd like to ask you to leave them in | for the time being, I'm working on getting the latest versions (8.0/8.1) | of ifort (how it is now known) and icc into the tree. The only problem | are my time constraints atm :-/. Though I have ebuilds ready, it will | still take some time to remove some minor itches before I'd commit them. | | Danny Please contact me in case you need any help to test the ebuilds. I think these ebuilds are far too important to be deleted from the portage tree. These tools are crucial for my (and other people's) job. Also add sci-libs/mkl to this list. Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCgO9YQTaBhxBS2xERAupzAJ9czZC93O+inKTiNBdk2xVnhC3yIACfUeYO Mg6HX5rhO+AWdjXTAsk1FeQ= =t9MT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list