From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4979b9j001739 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 07:09:37 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DV2OZ-0005oH-Ql for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:09:39 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DV2HM-0006Wp-QA for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:02:12 +0200 Received: from ip-213157000067.dialin.heagmedianet.de ([213.157.0.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:02:12 +0200 Received: from sf by ip-213157000067.dialin.heagmedianet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:02:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: sf Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: emerge-webrsync bandwidth improvement Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 09:09:57 +0200 Message-ID: <427F0CC5.3010000@b-i-t.de> References: <20050422130151.GB16038@exodus.wit.org> <4278BF96.2000909@b-i-t.de> <20050505030235.GA13705@exodus.wit.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-213157000067.dialin.heagmedianet.de User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050325) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20050505030235.GA13705@exodus.wit.org> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d4afd348-1346-4e58-ba5e-002678ce39a9 X-Archives-Hash: 2e788c8c4740e92587ce558ae26d06f6 Brian Harring wrote: ... > B) Permenant solution needed for when snapshots upstream aren't > generated, as occured 04/29. This probably will have to be > serverside- easiest route, otherwise have to implement version > jumping logic in bash, which is ugly Generate an empty delta when no snapshot exists? > C) cleansing of old snapshots. Current 'handling' of it (read: not > doing a damn thing) is ugly. :) Always create the most recent snapshot and delete old snapshots and all deltas? Regards Stephan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list