From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from igor.genone.homeip.net (dsl-082-082-142-168.arcor-ip.net [82.82.142.168])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j491tpKV000995
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 May 2005 01:55:52 GMT
Received: by igor.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 638102A47B; Mon,  9 May 2005 03:56:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [192.168.0.2])
	by igor.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95C02A477
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 May 2005 03:56:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <427EB618.6000404@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 04:00:08 +0300
From: Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] eclectic-0.9.1
References: <427D2702.8040001@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <427D2702.8040001@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-gr1-genone_0.7 (2004-11-16) on 
	igor.genone.homeip.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_05,
	MISSING_SUBJECT autolearn=ham version=3.0.2-gr1-genone_0.7
Subject: [gentoo-dev]
X-Archives-Salt: ee87d0f7-ae4b-4370-9679-d90242351a7c
X-Archives-Hash: 3baa018aece4a2922e48218c055cf9f8

Danny van Dyk wrote:
>  * profile:
>    List and switch Gentoo portage profiles. Check if selected
>    profile is valid in regard to used "ARCH".

Hmm, have to check this out and see if I can obsolete my own little hack 
for changing profile.

>  * What do we need to accomplish to get the status of an "Official
>    Gentoo Project" ? Is a manager voting necessary ?

Just put it as a subproject under base as it doesn't have the substance 
for a TLP, and I don't think azarah would mind it ;)

>  * What do the maintainers of Gentoo's various -config and -update
>    scripts think about converting their scripts into eclectic modules ?

Neither etc-update nor env-update fall into this domain.

>  * What is the best place for eclectic in the portage tree? app-admin as
>    it is an administrative tool? Or rather app-portage as it should be
>    used together with Gentoo only?

Keep it in app-admin as it isn't really portage related.

Nice to finally see this becoming public.

Marius
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list