From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j453Pr1l031087 for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 03:25:53 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DTWzr-0004xj-Mf for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 03:25:55 +0000 Message-ID: <42799242.7040303@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 20:25:54 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050411) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX References: <20050505022948.4CC05F5B41@mail.deploylinux.net> <42799125.2000608@cesmail.net> In-Reply-To: <42799125.2000608@cesmail.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 92d26a8d-d74c-4564-97b9-b5696bf46e58 X-Archives-Hash: 9a42d788828adfaead85acc01dd71bdc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > There are also some serious performance issues with I/O. Xen is a much > better way to go in the long run. See Did you read his post that said that wasn't an option? I hope not, because it would be annoying if you posted this anyway. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCeZJCXVaO67S1rtsRAnHOAJ0QRjIQ8yQQj9iveYt3z/NeE2WgLwCgne9m TkSf+uqQKfitB+b9dBSSJTc= =29U5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list