From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j44J3L7N002209 for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 19:03:21 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DTP9d-0007Nk-OE for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 19:03:29 +0000 Message-ID: <42791C81.3080407@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:03:29 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050411) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some new xorg ebuilds References: <4264BAB1.5050804@gentoo.org> <4265B00F.2030506@gentoo.org> <4265C541.9020104@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4e35bd2a-777a-4543-a359-7450bfd347b7 X-Archives-Hash: b7b7fe0dcead784d85ad88f55fd1ad7b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > However, my question is do you want gcc-4.0.0 bugs yet, or not? I tried > remerging w/ gcc4 without success, and now that I see the .99.5 > snapshot out, before I go trying to upgrade to it, I'm wondering if it's > worth my while to try it under my gcc4 gcc-profile, bugging > success/failure, or if you aren't ready for that yet and I should just > report on gcc-3.4.3 merges (gcc-3.3 is deprecated on amd64). mjc is working on gcc4+amd64+xorg. It seems to work fine on x86. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCeRyBXVaO67S1rtsRAmLXAJ9NnODLbR5vgrUbyGLbFHeJW9f+rACdHRb1 CP6AOuwngJ+PlfHp3ub8Kss= =P5sZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list