From: Omkhar Arasaratnam <omkhar@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:08:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4278D772.70709@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4278D32D.3070000@cesmail.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I was just going to say something similar, although I'm not an
> employee of IBM. Gentoo's parent organization is non-profit, and
> IBM is a for-profit international corporation. That means, at least
> in the USA, that any such agreement would need to be negotiated and
> approved by what Stan Freberg referred to as "a battery of
> white-lipped attorneys". I was surprised to see Debian on the
> original list for the same reason. Can someone confirm there is
> actually an IBM certification for Debian?
>
> BTW, here in the USA, for all practical purposes, if you want a
> corporate blessing for Linux on a particular hardware platform,
> your choices are pretty much constrained to Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux. IBM, HP and Dell I believe all have corporate agreements
> with Red Hat, and I wasn't even aware of SUSE being present in the
> approved list. The only other "corporate blessed Linux" I know of
> is the Wal-Mart low end PC that comes with Linspire loaded on it.
>
> Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
>
>> daniel.kerwin@allianz.de wrote:
>>
>>> First of all there are a lot of questions to answer:
>>
>>> - Who can do the certification? - What must be done to become
>>> certified? - What hardwaretypes will IBM offer? - Will the
>>> hardware stay at IBM or somewhere else?
>>
>>> Aside all IBM customers should request support for Gentoo from
>>> IBM because they'll only take this serious if many customers
>>> request support.
>>
>> Being an IBM employee in my day job I can provide some insight
>> here.
>>
>> NO
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> I have an extremely hard time believing that IBM would endorse a
>> community supported distro. The only distros that IBM supports
>> are corporate backed (RedHat, Suse, Turbo). So unless Gentoo is
>> under going a major change in the near future. That said - I'm
>> frequently wrong ;-) But hey, let us know what you find out
>>
>> -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer omkhar@gentoo.org
>> - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux:
>> http://ppc64.gentoo.org
>
>
It's definately possible that we're comparing apples to oranges here.
What *EXACTLY* is meant by support?
1. Will IBM throw some h/w to Gentoo for free - yes.
2. Will IBM assist with packaging some utilities if we raise enough of
a stink - maybe
3. Will IBM assist a customer with break/fix, SLA'ed support or
preload Gentoo on any server - hell no
What do we mean by "support". Please bear in mind IBM DOES NOT support
Debian in this fashion AFAIK. IBM may assist with development to some
small extent but if a customer calls in and ask for support - they're
up a creek.
So what are we looking for ? Like I stated before, IBM only officially
supports RHEL, SLES, Turbo Linux.
- --
Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer
omkhar@gentoo.org - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar
Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gentoo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCeNdy9msUWjh2lHURAkZ2AKCu2o1atwFjCC7RJ0dGjFjGAP8b5gCfRsNx
SWcpvT6bEpWi3CrqvFRux0A=
=RbbS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 9:03 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 9:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-05-04 9:17 ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 10:21 ` José Alberto Suárez López
2005-05-04 10:37 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Antwort: " Duncan
2005-05-04 10:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Cummings
2005-05-04 10:32 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-05-04 10:36 ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 13:32 ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2005-05-04 13:50 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 14:08 ` Omkhar Arasaratnam [this message]
2005-05-04 14:24 ` Michael Cummings
2005-05-04 14:18 ` Brett Curtis
2005-05-04 14:39 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 15:36 ` Brett Curtis
2005-05-04 14:12 ` Antwort: " daniel.kerwin
2005-05-04 14:28 ` Omkhar Arasaratnam
2005-05-04 14:35 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-05-04 13:47 ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-05-04 14:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-05-04 16:17 ` Michiel de Bruijne
2005-05-04 16:26 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-04 16:46 ` Lance Albertson
2005-05-04 16:55 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-04 20:28 ` Ryan
2005-05-04 22:31 ` David Krider
2005-05-04 23:14 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-05 1:28 ` Michiel de Bruijne
2005-05-05 14:11 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-05-09 20:27 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-05-05 1:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4278D772.70709@gentoo.org \
--to=omkhar@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox