From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.suchdol.net (www.suchdol.net [82.208.33.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j42GeSuZ027566 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 16:40:29 GMT Received: from [10.18.6.61] (slon.basa.dejvice.czf [10.18.6.61]) by www.suchdol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5037C3D8 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 18:40:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <427657FE.6010204@flaska.net> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 18:40:30 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIEt1bmRyw6F0?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Cutting down on non-cascaded profiles References: <4274ACD1.9020003@gentoo.org> <4274B10C.5060507@longlandclan.hopto.org> <42763F57.6080206@flaska.net> <42764CF6.4020608@gentoo.org> <4276513D.5060200@flaska.net> <42765654.3010404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42765654.3010404@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF27A4C822625D37E7C17260A" X-Archives-Salt: 3522028c-29e1-4b74-b36d-88b548829f2f X-Archives-Hash: 786b1659844b47277730e55a15d93b48 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF27A4C822625D37E7C17260A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stephen P. Becker wrote: > This is really getting into a whole different > discussion altogether about having a security update only tree, but > there has been talk of this a few times before...search the mailing list > archives. Yep, of course I know; I wasn't asking for "stable" tree. > Removing old profiles will do nothing other than forcing them to set a > new profile. Changing the profile won't stop people from doing security > only updates. Okay, as long as "changing the profile" won't affect people *much* (I mean if it doesn't break their boxes), it is perfectly correct. I asked just to make sure that broken /etc/make.profile won't completely screw up Portage or so :-). -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth --------------enigF27A4C822625D37E7C17260A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCdlf+amXfqERyJRcRAjdcAJ46D3wgoXSAlm8/5qGHShaPc4qoUQCeOn99 7PRG91kz98Sh5NS+b9zlnOE= =F6Bv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF27A4C822625D37E7C17260A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list