From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk (curlew.cs.man.ac.uk [130.88.13.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3UNlaJW021661 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 23:47:36 GMT Received: from rp015a.halls.manchester.ac.uk ([130.88.180.15]) by curlew.cs.man.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1DS1gO-000NRC-Jp for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 00:47:36 +0100 Message-ID: <42741920.5010605@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 00:47:44 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Anyone use wolk-sources? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1DS1gO-000NRC-Jp*CEn8/gXj2fo* X-Archives-Salt: a19b50cd-3633-4243-ad92-e8511eca0f93 X-Archives-Hash: e1e9debbac1ff8232d52a1cd145ded93 Hi, I'm considering masking wolk-sources and removing it from the tree. Do any people still have a good reason to use wolk-sources? wolk-sources is a heavily patched Linux 2.4 kernel which lacks upstream maintenance - the newest version being based on Linux 2.4.20. Any objections? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list