[gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]

Hi,

The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
(which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).

There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes to
be useful.

If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.

Sincerely,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Greg Hasseler]

On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
> than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
> (which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
>
> There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
> bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes to
> be useful.
>
> If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
> add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.
>
> Sincerely,
> Brix

Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power 
management guide at 
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should 
probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a 
minimum from the recommended daemon.

-----------------------
Greg
ghassel1@twcny.rr.com
ghasseler@gmail.com
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 688 bytes --]

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

>Hi,
>
>The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
>than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
>(which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
>
>There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
>bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes to
>be useful.
>
>If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
>add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.
>
>
>  
>
If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
updates/2Q-2005?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
> append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
> updates/2Q-2005?

Because 'move' is for renaming packages?

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 368 bytes --]

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

>On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
>  
>
>>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
>>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
>>updates/2Q-2005?
>>    
>>
>
>Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
>
>  
>
we used move to overwrite zebra with quagga. see bug 75766.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1138 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
> > than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
> > (which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
> >
> > There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
> > bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes to
> > be useful.
> >
> > If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
> > add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Brix
> 
> Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power 
> management guide at 
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should 
> probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a 
> minimum from the recommended daemon.

Good catch - I've added Dennis to CC: on this mail :)

Sincerely,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Jason Stubbs]

On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> >>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
> >>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
> >>updates/2Q-2005?
> >
> >Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
>
> we used move to overwrite zebra with quagga. see bug 75766.

In that case, quagga was a fork of zebra that used the same versioning. 
cpufreqd has nothing to do with speedfeq.

Regards,
Jason Stubbs
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Donnie Berkholz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote:
> 
>>Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
>>>
>>>>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
>>>>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
>>>>updates/2Q-2005?
>>>
>>>Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
>>
>>we used move to overwrite zebra with quagga. see bug 75766.
> 
> 
> In that case, quagga was a fork of zebra that used the same versioning. 
> cpufreqd has nothing to do with speedfeq.

Yeah, I can attest for moves to packages that already exist doing very
strange things. And if speedfreq ever gets picked up again, things
really start to get weird.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCbZQ0XVaO67S1rtsRAuEzAKDeA6GaLfetawGsHPeTU30Txurc2QCfaACF
hlfGeqC5EjhGWMvunonoBOo=
=cY+x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Greg Hasseler]

On Monday 25 April 2005 07:30 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> > On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in
> > > more than a year, and it is superseded in every way by
> > > sys-power/cpufreqd (which, in turn, is actively maintained by
> > > upstream).
> > >
> > > There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
> > > bugzilla - most of them indicating that it needs rather large changes
> > > to be useful.
> > >
> > > If no one objects (and claims the package + fixes the open bugs) I will
> > > add sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask in a week from now.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Brix
> >
> > Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power
> > management guide at
> > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should
> > probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a
> > minimum from the recommended daemon.
>
> Good catch - I've added Dennis to CC: on this mail :)
>
> Sincerely,
> Brix

Well, I was following the guide the other day so it was fresh in my mind :-D 
Gosh I love the smell of new laptop!

-----------------------
Greg
ghassel1@twcny.rr.com
ghasseler@gmail.com
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 559 bytes --]

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power 
> management guide at 
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should 
> probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or at a 
> minimum from the recommended daemon.

Dennis has updated the Power Management Guide as per bug #91043 - and I
have just added sys-power/speedfreq to package.mask.

Sincerely,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]