From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from longlandclan.hopto.org (202-47-55-78.adsl.gil.com.au [202.47.55.78]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3J1WbYi001799 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:32:38 GMT Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by uid 210); 19 Apr 2005 11:32:37 +1000 Received: from 10.0.0.251 by www (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.251):. Processed in 0.167488 secs); 19 Apr 2005 01:32:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.251?) (10.0.0.251) by 192.168.5.1 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 11:32:36 +1000 Message-ID: <42645FB3.5010405@longlandclan.hopto.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:32:35 +1000 From: Stuart Longland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] circular moves References: <20050418170950.1fbb4168@andy.genone.homeip.net> <200504181430.47356.vapier@gentoo.org> <1113873429.10933.38.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1113873429.10933.38.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig92DD972E66F009DCCD27F6A2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: bf309603-d5e5-4822-9fea-b0211b938dab X-Archives-Hash: 0831ac802d20812bb4f8db90f78c6bb6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig92DD972E66F009DCCD27F6A2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Olivier Crête wrote: > On Mon, 2005-18-04 at 14:30 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>On Monday 18 April 2005 11:09 am, Marius Mauch wrote: >> >>>4Q-2002:move net-misc/atftp net-ftp/atftp >>>3Q-2003:move net-ftp/atftp net-misc/atftp >> >>personally i dont who thought putting atftp into net-misc from net-ftp was a >>good idea ... all ftp packages should be in net-ftp right ? >> >>if no one cares i'll move: >>atftp / linksys-tftp / netkit-tftp >>from net-misc to net-ftp where they belong >>-mike > > > It might be related to the fact that they are tftp programs... which is > different from ftp... > True, but tftp is one method of transferring a file. So in that regard, it, and others such as rsync IMHO still belong in net-ftp. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | | Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | | I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ --------------enig92DD972E66F009DCCD27F6A2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCZF+zuarJ1mMmSrkRAq4EAJ98J3oE1NbU+dSPjV+QC0UEhvJZ5gCeNawP 20LfapAumAx4fgd1PCvObqQ= =KipI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig92DD972E66F009DCCD27F6A2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list