From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j3EM5MVq000343 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:05:23 GMT Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (vibhavgarg1@sbcglobal.net@69.216.246.123 with plain) by smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 22:05:21 -0000 Message-ID: <425EE925.30902@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:05:25 -0500 From: Vibhav Garg User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050413) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nested die error References: <200504141642.22339.caleb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200504141642.22339.caleb@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ac5046d0-1170-4dee-8dab-8bfe985c294b X-Archives-Hash: 65d39e63b0440412b6bf81722a41d941 Caleb Tennis wrote: >So it seems repoman doesn't like nested die calls like this: > >use blah && ( emake foo || die ) > > > i believe this is a question in the developer end quiz too:-) >But, without the parenthesis > >use blah && emake foo || die > >always dies (the emake functions just fine, but it returns an error once emake >is completed). > >What's the trick? Wrap the emake in a if/then call? Ignore repoman at the >risk of potential finger breakage by mr_bones'? > >-- >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list