From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from longlandclan.hopto.org (202-47-55-78.adsl.gil.com.au [202.47.55.78]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3EEFHt5000751 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:15:19 GMT Received: (qmail 1374 invoked by uid 210); 15 Apr 2005 00:15:20 +1000 Received: from 10.0.0.251 by www (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.251):. Processed in 0.095923 secs); 14 Apr 2005 14:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.251?) (10.0.0.251) by 192.168.5.1 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 00:15:19 +1000 Message-ID: <425E7B09.3040806@longlandclan.hopto.org> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:15:37 +1000 From: Stuart Longland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging References: <200504141054.35772.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20050414090119.GC6594@sole.infis.univ.trieste.it> <20050414090618.GA15959@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> <20050414091110.GD6594@sole.infis.univ.trieste.it> <1113477489.28419.1.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <87r7hda2oy.fsf@gentoo.net9.org> In-Reply-To: <87r7hda2oy.fsf@gentoo.net9.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC2427B9D69D0581892067BAD" X-Archives-Salt: 05755c77-8768-42bb-8562-0c3aa7f1f30e X-Archives-Hash: 4e81c620b4f5c7d94f73bf8fb9b13988 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC2427B9D69D0581892067BAD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ming Zhao wrote: Heh, well put ;-) Couldn't have said it better myself. :-P *getting back ontopic* At the moment, I'm used to just clicking the Reply button to send to the list... however, on most lists that I participate in, Reply-To is left alone, so I'm normally in the habit of clicking Reply-To-All. Seeing as I normally have to consciously think *click Reply, not RTA*, I for one certainly won't miss not having Reply-to-All. If anyone's inconvenienced though, I'm sure I can dig up some procmail recipes (and similar scripts) to remedy the situation, as we had the same issue on the Humbug[1] mailing lists some time back. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | | Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | | I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ 1. http://www.humbug.org.au --------------enigC2427B9D69D0581892067BAD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCXnsMuarJ1mMmSrkRAtrPAJ9U3T9mUK987OezTEvsiD77Kqge5wCeMhMD hDTiBAhKP3dRen11F8m3Qno= =o+Pc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC2427B9D69D0581892067BAD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list