From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from curlew.cs.man.ac.uk (curlew.cs.man.ac.uk [130.88.13.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3ALQ0Rm015929 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:26:01 GMT Received: from rp015a.halls.manchester.ac.uk ([130.88.180.15]) by curlew.cs.man.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1DKjwO-000IX0-JG for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:26:00 +0100 Message-ID: <42599AF5.6050103@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:30:29 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050403) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? References: <425956D1.5040006@gentoo.org> <1113156876.30765.5.camel@pursuit> In-Reply-To: <1113156876.30765.5.camel@pursuit> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1DKjwO-000IX0-JG*xbww1fNMUKg* X-Archives-Salt: a006bace-52b1-49a6-8693-38bdb8a1bcec X-Archives-Hash: 27fe20787f6534e3960c9b110ccdb0b4 Lance Albertson wrote: > Before everyone starts getting all antsy about getting svn for gentoo > projects, its in the works. I'm trying to get the current CVS admins > around so we can start with that process. Robbat2 seems to be busy for > the next few weeks, so I'll have to rely on Pylon to help with this. So > please just be patient and we'll get this rolling soon. Bugging me or > other people about will not get you anywhere :P I doubt this is the right place to ask, but I got no reply from the trustees, so... A while back, we had to move the gentoo kernel patches out of the Gentoo CVS because we realised it conflicted with the old copyright assignment form: I have signed an agreement saying that everything I put in gentoo cvs will be copyrighted to Gentoo. That obviously isn't the case for kernel patches that I didn't write. We moved the kernel patches into a bitkeeper repo, and they've been there for a while. However, this might be clashing with the social contract, and costless BK is going away, so its time to move again. I'd love to host these in a Gentoo repo, preferably SVN, but would need to get that agreement revoked for me and the other kernel developers. Who do I need to speak to? Thanks, Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list