Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?

[Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>]

Lance Albertson wrote:
> Before everyone starts getting all antsy about getting svn for gentoo
> projects, its in the works. I'm trying to get the current CVS admins
> around so we can start with that process. Robbat2 seems to be busy for
> the next few weeks, so I'll have to rely on Pylon to help with this. So
> please just be patient and we'll get this rolling soon. Bugging me or
> other people about will not get you anywhere :P

I doubt this is the right place to ask, but I got no reply from the trustees,
so...

A while back, we had to move the gentoo kernel patches out of the Gentoo CVS
because we realised it conflicted with the old copyright assignment form: I
have signed an agreement saying that everything I put in gentoo cvs will be
copyrighted to Gentoo. That obviously isn't the case for kernel patches that I
didn't write.

We moved the kernel patches into a bitkeeper repo, and they've been there for
a while. However, this might be clashing with the social contract, and
costless BK is going away, so its time to move again. I'd love to host these
in a Gentoo repo, preferably SVN, but would need to get that agreement revoked
for me and the other kernel developers. Who do I need to speak to?

Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list