From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4gQo-0005FX-J8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:17:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A688E076A; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com (mail-ew0-f165.google.com [209.85.219.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D922E076A for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1965703ewy.34 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tWnmMQLilk/xCyfgU8u0HFm7/gAEMuFZqFIYJHcH+bM=; b=aMJmgr8sdAKIgVLzGol0Wwu8gUTzI//ldz1276OsocgwKM5KieMX5OUH4ImfWzHCG9 hfEzk2Qo+ryLP/ABYLaLm7d9XVLW2JgC9lei24H2iaBXatEIKrMX+Ap9ZEAxTVe26Z44 U5wpAzCEPCF9GN+2aWB+HFnhpo/WkHAamdQqw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vZzrf13/lEDLL7psapnYi3up/LJXZaK37HvlkhW+CfHqjVO9N/NDVCed4x0sWwdK4t WZWJ70aVFqgTt8ReZZnftAP3sXQ/8XSxjBqHPvMLDci5eMJdYtPY/xzBs/rNoPm6MGt2 P+yaq8oenEby8bHrye9ljlzt1hurjEk3LidR4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.87.11 with SMTP id k11mr3151363ebb.20.1242328644719; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090514201130.64f39316@snowcone> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514193907.56754ae6@snowcone> <200905142105.53027.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514201130.64f39316@snowcone> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:17:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4255c2570905141217uda219cbp19a6160493e35c62@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 From: RB To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 48932c43-b72a-4257-81fb-2e8cb52bb3b7 X-Archives-Hash: b2a130685ba0c8c6effb082ce9bb6f91 On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 13:11, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Please explain why you claimed GLEP 55 makes things slower. Until you > answer that, it's hard to take you for anything other than a troll. Hell, I'll explain. Read paragraph 8 again. Slowly. Read it a second time, since you obviously didn't read the first time. The paragraph makes the point that the pro-GLEP55 stance says that encoding EAPI inside the file is slower. It is not saying GLEP55 is slower, it is attempting to debunk the theory that it is faster. You may be a lightning-fast typer and emailer, but until your comprehension catches up, you might want to consider reading things that make you angry twice.