From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2UCX0kG031939 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:33:00 GMT Received: from ms-smtp-04-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.134] helo=ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGcNX-0000IL-8r for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:32:59 +0000 Received: from zeus.ka0ttic.dyndns.org (114.175.205.68.cfl.res.rr.com [68.205.175.114]) by ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j2UCWvr3009849 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:32:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (bedlam [192.168.1.50]) by zeus.ka0ttic.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5C85BF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:32:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <424A7107.3090807@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:27:35 -0500 From: Aaron Walker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050325) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles (round 2) References: <42224847.1060703@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <42224847.1060703@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Archives-Salt: 16487e07-91f5-4903-8066-0cc6bfbb9ca9 X-Archives-Hash: 031236732c90ea253c5fb110628e6e06 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Walker wrote: > ciaranm brought this up a while back[1], and from what I can tell it doesn't > look like a consensus was ever reached. > > I'm working on a profile module for the top-sekrit eclectic project (formerly > known as eselect) and have run into the problem of not being able to provide a > list of valid profiles. > > 'find $(portageq portdir)/profiles -type d' was suggested but that would also > have base/ and updates/ in the list. > > Can we finish this discussion and get something implemented? > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&m=110201593924411&w=2 > Now that 2005.0 has been released, what's the status of this? Did we agree on a format? - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list - -- Zee oopussoom is a fery supheesticeted uneemel. It duesn't ifee get up unteel 5 oor 6 PM. Bork Bork Bork! Aaron Walker [ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim | web-apps ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSnEGC3poscuANHARAkEbAKCaeF9K6IWMuA8vkoleGmj5T8O4KQCdGol5 zaF2Ic2/nvq73VtOwiu98Zk= =+Y87 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list