From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCiGA-0004XC-Cr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:14:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7014CE0523; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aei-tech.com (static-69-95-200-80.ind.choiceone.net [69.95.200.80]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361B3E0523 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10277 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2008 21:10:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.aei-tech.com) (192.168.1.1) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2008 21:10:32 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.251 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ctennis) by www.aei-tech.com with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:10:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42480.192.168.1.251.1199913032.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <1199908487.8082.24.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080109121309.GA14454@ferdyx.org> <50574.192.168.2.159.1199888711.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <1199908487.8082.24.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:10:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January From: "Caleb Tennis" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 417c5115-a802-47bb-9e58-a32f6ee80e85 X-Archives-Hash: b7ca656ec4c34f813b85b672b27eb608 > Correct, you did not. What I find absolutely *damning* is the fact tha= t > as soon as any arches *were* mentioned, everybody was talking about the > same one. It's rather funny that everybody seems to have the exact sam= e > impression of what architecture might be a slacker and would be affecte= d > by this. I wonder why that is? Righto. I also have specific mips related issues, and while I'm certain = all of the mips conversation will play on lots of people's minds, I think it also is= helpful from the council point of view to address this generically as it may be a= problem for a different arch in the future. In other words, if people want to use mips as an example, then so be it, = but whatever resolution eventually comes to play shouldn't be mips specific. --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list