From: Daniel Goller <morfic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary of PPC team meeting
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:06:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423D9F7F.2010103@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050319205602.2b3bc787@snowdrop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:34:02 +0100 Lars Weiler <pylon@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | That means, we will work an a common-profile with sub-profiles for ppc
> | and ppc64. A first target-date would be the 2005.1 release. The
> | masterplan[tm] for the team-merge should be presented at the next
> | meeting (in about four weeks).
>
> Is the ultimate aim a merged keyword like we did for sparc64 + sparc32
> -> sparc? If so, please don't use manson's script :)
>
> It'd be nice to see x86/amd64 going this way as well. I mean, we can fit
> mips under one keyword, and there's far more difference there than there
> is between a 386 and an opteron.
>
and i still can't see how amd64 devs would like to be lost in the void
that we call x86
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Goller <morfic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary of PPC team meeting
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:06:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423D9F7F.2010103@gentoo.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20050320160623._LQGH-x4ZGaVC-8j3SmU9MoozteH8r-a89tvcse-Xmw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050319205602.2b3bc787@snowdrop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:34:02 +0100 Lars Weiler <pylon@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | That means, we will work an a common-profile with sub-profiles for ppc
> | and ppc64. A first target-date would be the 2005.1 release. The
> | masterplan[tm] for the team-merge should be presented at the next
> | meeting (in about four weeks).
>
> Is the ultimate aim a merged keyword like we did for sparc64 + sparc32
> -> sparc? If so, please don't use manson's script :)
>
> It'd be nice to see x86/amd64 going this way as well. I mean, we can fit
> mips under one keyword, and there's far more difference there than there
> is between a 386 and an opteron.
>
and i still can't see how amd64 devs would like to be lost in the void
that we call x86
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-20 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-19 20:34 [gentoo-dev] Summary of PPC team meeting Lars Weiler
2005-03-19 20:56 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-19 21:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-19 21:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-19 21:52 ` Lars Weiler
2005-03-19 21:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-19 23:19 ` Brian Harring
2005-03-20 16:06 ` Daniel Goller [this message]
2005-03-20 16:06 ` Daniel Goller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=423D9F7F.2010103@gentoo.org \
--to=morfic@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox