From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2HJF8ha022563 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:15:09 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DC0SZ-00010Z-BM for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:15:07 +0000 Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DC0Sa-0004VT-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:15:08 +0100 Received: from [80.229.223.243] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DC0SZ-0002ou-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:15:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4239D6C5.3090507@tomaw.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:13:09 +0000 From: Tom Wesley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE split ebuilds References: <423736A9.5040101@tomaw.org> <200503162229.21736.danarmak@gentoo.org> <4238AE1B.7030301@tomaw.org> <200503172111.01706.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200503172111.01706.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBBA8B4434E8740C0EF200193" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e0c4ec921101b4afa5f9efb3db39afe3 X-Archives-Salt: 19acbfe0-fed7-495e-83fc-c69f5321510f X-Archives-Hash: fd3c1b0914ee4f3f50cfc151601589dc This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBBA8B4434E8740C0EF200193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dan Armak wrote: > On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:07, Tom Wesley wrote: > >>I can't disagree that p'masking a bucket-load of packages, all at >>different versions will be a pain. Also, upgrading etc may require a >>small army of gnome's (pun intended) to complete the task in a timely >>manner. > > Indeed. Which is why I don't want to do this. > > >>Do any kde applications release outside of kde's main releases? (I have >>a vague recollection of kopete doing this, but no others) > > Usually they stop when, or soon after, they are made part of an official > kde.org package. I can't recall any app that does this right now. Anyway, for > the very few that do, we can include extra releases with made-up version > numbers (or dates) that sort of make sense. These cases are so rare that this > doesn't fall into the 'confusing users' category IMHO. Given those facts you've probably decided upon the best numbering scheme... Confused users can easily be directed to use the KDE version numbers I guess... Thanks for entertaining the idea ;) -- Tom Wesley --------------enigBBA8B4434E8740C0EF200193 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCOdbIVYNIRGKYOlIRAvKMAJ0Wm+bmkv1Hy9OtxNtjJj7uHhGW0wCfbntB HJ2lGiOKb1TN8JJLQWUoQRQ= =mCR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBBA8B4434E8740C0EF200193-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list