From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from parrot.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [156.56.111.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2FJRS74027614 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:27:28 GMT Received: (qmail 15697 invoked by uid 89); 15 Mar 2005 19:27:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 4495 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2005 19:27:24 +0000 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (212.227.126.190) by lists.gentoo.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2005 19:27:24 +0000 Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DBHhP-0007Jz-00 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:27:27 +0100 Received: from [80.229.223.243] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DBHhO-0002gM-00 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:27:26 +0100 Message-ID: <423736A9.5040101@tomaw.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:25:29 +0000 From: Tom Wesley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev Subject: [gentoo-dev] KDE split ebuilds X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD9E68DC017B913D46A853FEE" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e0c4ec921101b4afa5f9efb3db39afe3 X-Archives-Salt: 195187d5-8909-46e5-9718-d165c542cd0d X-Archives-Hash: bb016fd3b51aaedfe10d01163bcadb81 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD9E68DC017B913D46A853FEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey I've seen several queries regarding KDE's new split ebuilds and the version numbers used for specific packages. It seems that all of the KDE 3.4 packages have been versioned as 3.4. Should kmail, kopete etc not be using their own version numbers with the meta-packages being versioned based on the kde release number? IMO this would make more sense, especially when reading the kopete website, finding the latest version is 0.9.2 and then noticing that portage only has 3.4. -- Tom Wesley --------------enigD9E68DC017B913D46A853FEE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCNzarVYNIRGKYOlIRAhlsAJwKab8z+slA6bFxLnNbbHKruMsH5QCfdPrJ jH+MWgbcv70dxJTumfzobvw= =wP1S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD9E68DC017B913D46A853FEE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list