From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2F98iD9029440 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:08:44 GMT Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.56]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DB82d-0000D3-M9 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:08:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id E1A81445D9 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:08:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from dimosys.siphos.be (d54C2A6C6.access.telenet.be [84.194.166.198]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5691442B1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:08:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dimosys.siphos.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2B534D8A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:08:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4236A61A.2020905@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:08:42 +0100 From: Sven Vermeulen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050307) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] apache and ~arch References: <20050313172441.GA21923@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20050314144341.3017e91b@snowdrop> <4235C283.6050109@gentoo.org> <20050314181738.14b6fff7@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20050314181738.14b6fff7@sven.genone.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9aa037d4-bbb7-4a7c-849f-483d0853e9fa X-Archives-Hash: 20b58fbcdcf064acfb480b6b0dae78c9 Marius Mauch wrote: > http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/hollow/2005/03/14/apache_dithering > "... and users using testing may not complain if things break." > > That's the real problem. They *should* complain, constructively, on a bugreport, stating the issue and how they could resolve it. If people wouldn't be allowed to reply to ~arch bugs, then why do we have ~arch? -- ^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. (oo) Sven Vermeulen (__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation & PR -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list