From: Thierry Carrez <koon@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile?
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:09:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42358CF0.2000009@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Thoughts / comments? I promise not to bite anyone's head off this time!
It's a good thing to have enhancement proposals clearly explained and
written and the GLEP system does a great job for that. The way I see it,
the system generally fails after the GLEP is written :
- They are voted at Managers meeting level and people don't feel their
views are represented there
- Voted enhancements that need coordinating several Gentoo teams at the
same time (Metabugs) don't fly very well
These aren't GLEP-specific problems, these are metastructure problems.
They should both be solved by the current effort to reform our
metastructure.
--
Koon
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-14 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 14:39 [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 15:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 15:47 ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-03-11 15:50 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 15:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 16:09 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 17:05 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 17:40 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 18:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 20:28 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 20:30 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 21:01 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 21:30 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 22:07 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 18:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 18:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 16:28 ` Marius Mauch
2005-03-11 19:40 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 19:59 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 20:13 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 20:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-11 17:03 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-11 19:25 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-11 20:59 ` Ian Leitch
2005-03-11 21:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-11 21:31 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 21:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-11 21:54 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-11 23:34 ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-03-11 16:10 ` Benjamin A. Collins
2005-03-11 16:34 ` Marius Mauch
2005-03-11 19:42 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-14 13:09 ` Thierry Carrez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42358CF0.2000009@gentoo.org \
--to=koon@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox