From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2D9vxen021815 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:57:59 GMT Received: from mx.ineton.ro ([217.156.27.7] helo=mx.loginet.ro) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAPrB-0005ro-VA for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:57:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 13473 invoked by uid 204); 13 Mar 2005 11:57:58 +0200 Received: from mrness@gentoo.org by hera by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:. Processed in 1.046746 secs); 13 Mar 2005 09:57:58 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mrness@gentoo.org via hera X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.046746 secs) Received: from tg-neamt1.ineton.ro (HELO ?217.156.27.36?) (217.156.27.36) by mx.ineton.ro with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 11:57:55 +0200 Message-ID: <42340EA2.9080806@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:57:54 +0200 From: Alin Nastac Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] why went unusable versions stable? References: <200503120101.16451.list-gentoo-dev@net4u.de> <1110590519.10977.1.camel@localhost> <42338E75.1030602@gentoo.org> <1110707303.32297.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1110707303.32297.9.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9001EAC0E964B134BF059D44" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a0ecc0b4-4329-48a8-822f-5961179c8e79 X-Archives-Hash: 842ca26097e5a35668bf8acfb40bfa12 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9001EAC0E964B134BF059D44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Olivier Crête wrote: >On Sun, 2005-13-03 at 02:51 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote: > > >>Olivier Crête wrote: >> >> >>This package I happen to use at work, I could say I did more than a >>simple test. >>Do you suggest that, if this bug is real, I should know about? >>Do you understand that tests don't always detect bugs, right? >> >> > >Ohh I was just commenting on another QA related thread... and I was >extrapolating that this might be related to a certain QA policy that >certain developers seem to follow... But it is sure that testing doesn't >find the interesting bugs (that's why we need users!)... > > > On second thought, I've made a mistake marking this package as stable. It is in its early development stage and I've should look on its changelog first. --------------enig9001EAC0E964B134BF059D44 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCNA6iRZBYwhawvi4RAsQuAJ9/+6Np4akSoe+kRDUXNRm/ZrzG0wCeOdfU PR5OzJuxuFHALnwjSY3R8zA= =wjxm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9001EAC0E964B134BF059D44-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list